Lead with the management picture.
First-pass acceptance, open NCRs, overdue actions and the reporting context behind each measure.
Marmore / Quality Intelligence
A clearer view of
project quality.
Marmore Quality Intelligence is our managed Power BI reporting service for project quality. Turn inspection logs, NCR registers and corrective actions into clear dashboards and a consistent management review.
Request a Demo ↗MARMORE / MQIINTERACTIVE DEMO
Project quality, in focus.
Industrial expansion demonstrator · September 2026
96.2%First-pass acceptance
17Open NCRs
4Overdue actions
Explore a view ↓
First-pass acceptance
Three reporting periods · vertical axis 90–100%
Read the context. 577 of 600 first attempts accepted in September. Improvement: 1.4 percentage points since July.
Where open records are aging
Illustrative age distribution · 17 open NCRs · scale 0–8 records
0–7 days
8
8–14 days
5
15–30 days
3
31+ days
1
Focus the review. Four open records are more than 14 days old. Check blockers and agree the next action with each owner.
Make follow-through visible
25 open corrective actions · September 30 snapshot
21 within due date
4 overdue
16% require review
4 overdue
16% require review
Turn reporting into action. Review the owner, due date and closure evidence behind each overdue item.
Fictional data · Illustrative interfaceNo live customer records
Synthetic demonstration · September 2026 · Presentation concept, not a live Power BI report
READ THE DEMO / UNDERSTAND THE MEASURE
A number is only useful
when its meaning is clear.
Open a measure to see its definition, its limits and the question it should help your team answer. All examples use fictional data.
577 / 600
First attempts accepted
96.2% when rounded to one decimal place.
17
Open nonconformances
A snapshot of unresolved records, not a defect rate.
4 / 25
Open actions overdue
16% of open actions need a due-date review.
01 / How is first-pass acceptance calculated? +
THE CALCULATION
Accepted first attempts ÷ all eligible first attempts × 100.IN THIS EXAMPLE
577 ÷ 600 × 100 = 96.17%, displayed as 96.2%. Reinspections are tracked separately.THE REVIEW QUESTION
Which disciplines or recurring issues explain the change? Compare equivalent scope and show inspection volumes alongside rates.02 / What does NCR aging tell us? +
THE DEFINITION
Elapsed calendar days from the recorded opening date to the reporting date for records still open.IN THIS EXAMPLE
8 records aged 0–7 days, 5 aged 8–14, 3 aged 15–30 and 1 aged 31 or more: 17 in total.THE REVIEW QUESTION
Which records are blocked, who owns the next step and what evidence is needed? Age alone does not establish severity.03 / When is an action overdue? +
THE DEFINITION
An open action whose agreed due date is earlier than the reporting date.IN THIS EXAMPLE
4 of 25 open actions are overdue at the September 30 snapshot. The other 21 remain within their due dates.THE REVIEW QUESTION
Does the owner have a clear next action and credible closure evidence? Missing due dates should be flagged separately, not silently treated as on time.Metric definitions, eligible records and reporting dates are agreed with each client before implementation.
Four focused views
The right perspective
for each conversation.
Understand inspection performance.
First attempts and reinspections, acceptance trends, disciplines and item-level source records.
See the unresolved work.
Open-item age, recurring categories, closure trends and a traceable register of nonconformances.
Keep comparisons in context.
Inspection counts and first-pass rates alongside open NCRs and overdue actions. Always review comparable scope.
FROM RECORDS TO DECISIONS
See how the pieces connect.
A controlled reporting cycle turns separate project records into a shared view of quality.
01 / YOUR PROJECT RECORDS
Inspection logs
First attempts, results, reinspections
NCR registers
Status, age, discipline, ownership
Corrective actions
Due dates, blockers, closure evidence
02 / MARMORE QUALITY INTELLIGENCE
Structure. Validate. Connect.
Align identifiers and definitions. Surface missing data. Build traceable measures.
AGREED SOURCES → CONSISTENT METRICS03 / A CLEARER MANAGEMENT VIEW
Performance trends ↗
What changed—and how much?
Exceptions in focus ↗
Which records need attention?
Priority actions ↗
Who owns the next step?
↻
04 / Review. Act. Repeat.
Map your reporting workflow ↗Your team closes the loop. The next reporting cycle shows what changed.
From implementation to recurring review
A reporting service.
A consistent rhythm.
We build Microsoft Power BI dashboards around your existing inspection logs, NCR registers and corrective-action records. Where suitable, MQI can be delivered within your organization’s existing Power BI and Microsoft infrastructure, working with your IT team.
We begin with a source-data assessment, agreed KPI definitions and validation against your source totals. Data connections, refresh schedules, licensing, access controls and deployment are confirmed for your environment before implementation.
Scope follows your needs
Start focused.
Build a repeatable service.
Starter
One project, defined source exports and core reporting views.
Professional
Broader reporting needs, additional comparisons and recurring management reviews.
Enterprise
Multi-project reporting, governance and tailored delivery requirements.
Implementation and recurring service are scoped through discovery. No self-service checkout.
BEFORE WE BEGIN
Practical questions.
Clear answers.
MQI begins as a managed reporting service using Microsoft Power BI. We define the sources, responsibilities and delivery environment together.
Discuss your reporting needs ↗What source formats can we start with? +
Structured Excel or CSV exports are the preferred starting point. Other formats require assessment; PDF extraction is separately scoped and reviewed.
Does MQI replace our project system? +
The initial service analyzes agreed exports and reporting inputs. System-of-record responsibilities remain defined in the engagement.
Is data refreshed automatically? +
Refresh method and frequency depend on approved access, source readiness and scope. Live integration is not assumed.
Do we need Power BI licenses? +
Licensing depends on the delivery environment and audience and is confirmed before rollout.
How long does implementation take? +
We establish the schedule after reviewing source readiness and agreeing the scope.
How do we share project records? +
Controlled data transfer is arranged separately during discovery. Please do not submit confidential project records through the website.
See what your data can tell you
Bring your reporting challenge.
Start with the questions, sources and reporting cadence that matter to your project.
Request a Demo ↗